When I started to write my post on our new reference reading room, I immediately got sidetracked by the name of the room. So, I decided to move that whole discussion to a separate post.
So, what's in a name? Technically, it's just called the reading room (as the sign on the picture below indicates), but since our reference collections are in there and that's where our reference desk is, I think it should be called the reference reading room. I might just be partial to that term, though, because, when I worked in the Main Reading Room of the Library of Congress, the area where the librarians provided reference is called the reference reading room.
I know that this space is intended to be a quiet space in contrast to what is expected to be the more noisy collaborative spaces in the research commons. However, calling it a reading room implies that it's just a place to read. Now, there is absolutely nothing wrong with reading rooms or study areas. However, if you are going to put the reference desk in there, then it's not going to be totally quiet. And, really, if we're going to be spending money on them, then those reference books shouldn't just be for decoration. So, which one is it? Is it a reading room, or is it a reference room?
Juliet in Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet, says:
"What's in a name? That which we call a roseHowever, L.M. Montgomery's Anne of Green Gables counters:
By any other name would smell as sweet."
I read in a book once that a rose by any other name would smell as sweet, but I've never been able to believe it. I don't believe a rose would be as nice if it was called a thistle or a skunk cabbage.So, which one is it? I guess we'll see when it opens...
No comments:
Post a Comment